Data poisoning is an attack in artificial intelligence where malicious, false, or manipulated data is deliberately inserted into training data, or datasets used to update machine learning (ML) models. This corrupts how models learn patterns, causing them to produce incorrect or biased outputs.

Systems used as part of critical business processes, such as enterprise search or data insights,  can all be impacted by data poisoning. It damages the accuracy and reliability of AI models that process large volumes of text, transactions, or other business data. Poisoned data misleads systems in the same way falsified records mislead auditors, causing flawed insights and reduced confidence in workflow automation. 

Data poisoning differs from adversarial attacks, which attempt to deceive a trained model during predictions by using specially crafted inputs or prompt engineering, rather than altering the model’s learning data.

How does data poisoning work?

Data poisoning undermines machine learning systems by contaminating the data these systems rely on for learning and making predictions.

The steps below explain how data poisoning operates within organizational processes, and why it can create serious risks for business outcomes.

1. Inserting malicious data

Attackers introduce harmful or deceptive records into datasets by breaching internal infrastructure or exploiting public data channels. In healthcare, for instance, falsified patient records could warp analyses of treatment effectiveness, threatening patient safety and regulatory compliance.

2. Blending with legitimate data

Malicious records are carefully designed to resemble genuine data, allowing them to bypass routine quality controls. This blending can distort demand forecasts within retail organizations, leading to inventory imbalances, excess costs, or missed sales opportunities.

3. Training the system

Enterprises unknowingly train systems on corrupted datasets, causing poisoned information to influence statistical patterns and learned relationships. In manufacturing, this could lead a predictive maintenance tool to misjudge equipment health, triggering costly downtime or unnecessary repairs.

4. Triggering manipulated outcomes

When deployed, the compromised system generates biased or inaccurate results whenever poisoned patterns reappear in new inputs. Such distortions might misclassify legal documents or misinform risk assessments, undermining case strategies and business decisions.

5. Detecting and mitigating impact

Organizations track performance metrics and audit data pipelines to identify anomalies linked to poisoning. Rapid detection and prompt retraining helps financial institutions to safeguard critical processes, protect assets, and maintain stakeholder trust. Advanced techniques — such as analyzing vector representations (mathematical formats that express data points as numeric arrays) for unusual patterns — can support earlier detection in large-scale datasets.

Types of data poisoning

Data poisoning means intentionally corrupting the data that an AI system learns from, creating errors or vulnerabilities. Threat actors exploit varied parts of the data pipeline or system workflows, using different types of attacks.

  • Label flipping: Threat actors swap correct labels for incorrect ones so the system makes flawed connections. For example, in healthcare, scans labeled “benign” instead of “malignant” could cause a diagnostic tool to miss cancer cases.
  • Backdoor insertion: Hidden patterns are placed in training data so the system behaves normally but produces harmful results when it spots a specific signal. In finance, this could allow certain fraudulent transactions to slip through unnoticed under particular conditions.
  • Availability attacks: These attacks overload systems with misleading or extreme data, reducing accuracy or stopping processes altogether. A manufacturing tool flooded with bad sensor readings might start approving defective products as safe.
  • Clean-label attacks: Data looks normal and correctly labeled but subtly steers the system to act differently under certain situations. In e-commerce, product recommendations using improperly labeled data might secretly push customers toward specific items while appearing unbiased.

Data poisoning vs. prompt injections

Data poisoning and prompt injections both threaten enterprise AI systems but have fundamental differences.

Data poisoning targets model training data, embedding harmful patterns that degrade performance or integrity long-term, whereas prompt injections manipulate model outputs by inserting deceptive instructions into user inputs at runtime.

AspectData PoisoningPrompt Injections
DefinitionCorrupting training data to influence model behavior, accuracy, or trustworthiness, often covertly and persistently.Injecting hidden instructions into input text to steer model responses in unintended ways during use.
Business AdvantagesSupports robust governance by highlighting the need for rigorous data sourcing, quality controls, and audit trails.Drives improvements in prompt validation and user input controls, strengthening AI agent security posture.
Enterprise ChallengesDifficult to detect and remediate; poisoned models may propagate risks across systems, harming compliance, trust, and performance.Requires constant monitoring and filtering to prevent malicious user influence, complicating deployment of AI agents at scale.

Understanding both types of threat is crucial for enterprises to ensure secure AI systems that are in alignment with data compliance and AI governance best practices.

FAQs